World Cup Preview

World Tour (Weezy, Wale, Dre) – Brenton Duvall

Argentina – Tokyo Police Club

We’ve waited 1,428 days since Andres Iniesta scored the winning goal for Spain.  And now there are just a couple more days left until Brazil takes the pitch against Croatia, and the World Cup bestows its wonderful presence on us for a month.

This post will cover my predictions for each group, and some rather pointless speculation about what might happen in the knockout stage if my guesses about the groups were to pan out.  I’ll admit up front that I’m a little bit less plugged into things than I was four years ago, when I felt like I could speak pretty confidently about most of the teams in the competition.  This time around, there are a lot of young talents that I know of but don’t really know much about, and I fully expect that some of them will be absolute revelations to me.  So take my opinions and predictions with the appropriately big grain of salt.

One big theme, I think, is going to be the overwhelming dominance of Europe and South America.  I’m predicting zero North American teams, zero African teams, and only one Asian team to get out of the group stage.  Most likely, another one or two will slip in.  But I really think that the top 10-12 teams in this tournament come from the two power continents.  And a lot of the African and North American teams, in particular, are a bit weaker than they were four years ago.  If I’m right, it could well be a bloodbath for those confederations.

Group A (Brazil, Croatia, Mexico, Cameroon)

Brazil is clearly the cream of the crop here.  But I have a hard time placing just how good this team really is. I suppose they are mild favorites, but there are a lot of questions about them. Neymar is good, but can he carry the team?  They’ve got great attacking fullbacks, but will they be exposed on defense?  I’m not fully convinced by Oscar and Hulk. Will they regret not really having a top-class center forward? But those are questions for the second round. They should win the group at a canter.  Second place is a toss-up. I think Croatia is the strongest of the three, certainly on the evidence of their recent results. Mexico was atrocious in qualifying and hasn’t looked much better since.  But for all that, they’ve got a lot of talent so it wouldn’t shock me to see them advance.

  • 1st: Brazil
  • 2nd: Croatia

Group B (Spain, Netherlands, Chile, Australia)

Spain are the current holders of…basically everything worth winning in world football (World Cup, European champions, two Spanish teams were in the Champions League final, they won the Europa League, and so on).  Their cycle is starting to reach its conclusion, so I wouldn’t quite call them favorites to repeat.  But it’s also hard to argue against them. Their defense is a little shaky, particular against set pieces.  And their strikers all have question marks.  And Xavi doesn’t quite have the legs anymore.  But there is just so much talent in this team that their second-string would still be one of the five or six best in the tournament.  A lot of people seem to be down on the Dutch, but I think they’re pretty strong. Their defense is mostly drawn from the Eredivisie, which is a red flag. But they have some of the best attacking talent in the world and if they can gel could once again threaten to finally win a cup for themselves.  I suppose that means I’m tipping Chile to miss out here, which is a tough call.  They are an excellent team, and will be difficult to play. In almost any other group, they’d be likely to advance. Just not this one.

  • 1st: Spain
  • 2nd: Netherlands

Group C (Colombia, Greece, Ivory Coast, Japan)

Colombia is everyone’s dark horse for this tournament, and I suppose they are for me, too. Even without Falcao. I could actually see any two teams advance here, but my gut tells me that Colombia is too solid to lose to any of these teams, which will get them first place.  I think Ivory Coast is just a couple years too late.  Apart from Yaya Toure, who is one of the very small number of players that could argue for being third best in the world (behind Ronaldo and Messi).  He can dominate a game like almost no one else, so it’s hard to argue against them.  But most of the supplemental parts are much weaker than the past several iterations of this team. So I’m tempted to go with them, but am going to stick with Japan.  Now, I’m not nearly as high on them as I was 12-18 months ago.  Some of their key players had pretty down years (Keisuke Honda and Shinji Kagawa in particular).  But they strike me as the most fluid team in the group, and I make them slight favorites to take second place. Greece will be Greece and I will hate them.  And they certainly could lumber their way to a victory and a draw and a berth in the second round.  I certainly hope not, though.

  • 1st: Colombia
  • 2nd: Japan

Group D (Uruguay, Costa Rica, England, Italy)

I weirdly think this England team is sneakily good.  They’ve got a lot of in-form players, and the weight of expectations seems to be pretty low.  Their back line is solid (well, except for right back) and they’ve got a couple attackers who have hit their stride at exactly the right time (Sturridge, Sterling).  Honestly, if they just handed this team over to the Liverpool contingent, they could be quite good.  What will drag them down is lack of control in the midfield, and an over-reliance on Wayne Rooney—who is a world class player in some respects but doesn’t fit into this particular team, and is unreliable even at his best.  I massively under-rated Uruguay four years ago, and I’m going to do it again this time around. If Suarez is fully fit and on his game, they could win the group. But if not, I don’t see it. Apart from him, I think this team is much weaker than last time around.  Italy will be Italy, I suppose. Honestly, they don’t seem too impressive for me.  Who is going to score goals for them? And their backline is as rickety as its been in many a year. Still, they’re Italy. Costa Rica is not very good and will be lucky to get a single point.

  • 1st:  England
  • 2nd: Italy

Group E (Switzerland, Ecuador, France, Honduras)

Oh, France, will your good fortune never cease?  FIFA changed the rules of the draw right before it took place, and stuck Italy in the extra bin, rather than France who should have been there.  Which meant Italy got a MUCH tougher group. And here is France, who just have to beat a good-but-unexciting Switzerland, a team that dominates at home in the mountains but is not very impressive elsewhere (Ecuador), and another rotten team from CONCACAF (Honduras).  After 2010 and 2002, I will believe anything about France’s potential to screw up, but I’ll still pick them to win this group with ease.  And hopefully be proven wrong again.

  • 1st: France
  • 2nd: Ecuador

Group F (Argentina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iran, Nigeria)

Nigeria and Iran might pick up a point from each other, but should be pretty well toasted by the other two in this group.  I’m picking Argentina to win the whole thing, partly because I think they are very very good.  And partly because they have the easiest route to the semifinals of anyone in the world.  Win this group, beat the second place team from the very weak Group E, and get a quarterfinal match against someone like Portugal or Belgium.  They’ve built this team around Messi, and I think he’s going to finally win the World Cup that will cement his place among the all-time greats.  Along with him, there’s Aguero (who is luminescent in his own right), Di Maria (who was the best player in the Champions League final a couple weeks ago), and Higuain.  This team is going to attack.  A lot.  Which means the other key player is Javier Mascherano, who is going to be responsible for shutting down the inevitable counterattacks.  Argentina should be fun to watch.

  • 1st: Argentina
  • 2nd: Bosnia-Herzegovina

Group G (Germany, Portugal, USA, Ghana)

And here are our boys.  I have to say: I’m not optimistic.  I certainly think this team has it in them to beat Ghana and nick a draw from Portugal and/or Germany.  But each of those results is at least a little optimistic.  I would not be at all shocked if we only get one point (or even zero) from this group.  The key player, by a mile, is Michael Bradley.  If we do well it’s going to be because Bradley is able to exert himself on the game.  He has the vision that no one else has got.  We could also benefit enormously from the good version of Altidore (who was totally absent with Sunderland this year but has re-appeared in the last two warmup games).  But we’re relying heavily on Kyle Beckerman to preserve our shape.  And, I mean, I like Beckerman.  But…against the German attack…I’m just not sure it’s going to work.  Germany has lost Reus, which is a real blow for them, but as with Spain, they could run out their second line and still have a decent shot of winning this thing.  If they have a genuine weakness, I guess it’s at left back?  And possibly their midfield (especially without Reus) might not be quite as strong as one might have expected.  Khedira is barely back from injury, Schweinsteiger doesn’t look nearly as dominant as he did a few years ago, Ozil has blown hot and cold, etc.  But that’s measured against a VERY high standard.  They might well have the best midfield in the world, even with those concerns.  Portugal is going to live or die based on Ronaldo, who is the best player in the world right now (and only partly because Messi has had a ‘down’ year).  The rest of their team is very good, but if Ronaldo dominates like he’s capable of, Portugal could end up adding their name to short list of countries that have won a World Cup.  Ghana has knocked the US out of the last two tournaments and I’m terrified they’re going to (effectively) do so again this time around.  I think this team is a fair step weaker than the 2010 version, but the US probably is, too.  That first game is going to be mighty tense.

  • 1st: Germany
  • 2nd: Portugal

Group H (Belgium, Algeria, Russia, South Korea)

Belgium are the hipster pick, and I’m going to go right along with it. Their golden generation has all hit stride at the same time, and might well be a hurricane through this tournament. They’ve got a great keeper, great central defenders, a great midfield, and talented strikers.  They don’t really have any natural fullbacks, which could be their weak spot, but even that is compensated by their strength and canniness in the central midfield. This isn’t a team that has to rely on width to pick apart a defense.  If Lukaku were to get injured, that could cause real problems for them, since Benteke is already out and they don’t really have another option to play the lone striker role.  As for the other teams, Russia has not impressed me much when I’ve watched them, but I don’t have much faith in South Korea or Algeria being able to knock them out.

  • 1st: Belgium
  • 2nd: Russia

Those results would set up these second round matches:

  • Brazil over the Netherlands – This is a really terrible draw for Brazil, to face the team who knocked them out last time this early. But I think they’ll eke out a win here
  • Colombia over Italy – The Azzurri will be beaten at their own game in this one.
  • Spain over Croatia – It’ll probably be a straightforward 1-0, with Spain controlling possession and doing just enough to get their needed goal
  • England over Japan – I think Hodgson is particularly well suited to shut down a team like Japan. A comfortable 2-0
  • France over Bosnia – Ugh. I’m still picking France.  I really like Bosnia a lot, just don’t think they’ll have quite enough. This could very easily go to penalties
  • Germany over Russia – An easy win for the Germans
  • Argentina over Ecuador – Argentina thumped Ecuador 4-0 in qualifying. Could easily see that again here
  • Portugal over Belgium – Another big match between two very good teams.  I make Portugal the slight favorites, but it really could go either way.

For the quarterfinals:

  • Brazil over Colombia
  • Spain over England
  • Germany over France
  • Argentina over Portugal

Yes, I’m just picking the consensus top-four teams to make the semifinals.  I wanted to go with someone else, but I just can’t quite justify it.  I would say that eventual victor has an 80-85% chance of coming from these four.  Maybe a little more.  The only other teams I give a meaningful shot to are the Netherlands, Belgium, and Portugal.  Maybe France and Colombia.  Everyone else is in ‘hey, Greece won the Euros so anything is possible, right?’ territory.

For the semifinals, I have the South American countries beaten their European opposition, which sets up an Argentina-Brazil match for the ages in the final.  And I believe in the power of Messi, so I’m going to pick Argentina to hoist the cup.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Bands that shouldn’t be one-hit wonders

Unsatisfaction – Men Without Hats

Building a little bit off my last question: who is traditionally thought of as a one-hit wonder, but actually has a bunch of great songs?  A-Ha, for example, is usually thought of exclusively in terms of “Take on Me” but actually had a bunch of great albums.  Same goes for Men Without Hats, who people only know through “Safety Dance” but who actually had one of the best albums of the whole 80s in Folk Of The 80’s (Part III) (seriously, go buy it).  

Harvey Danger was a fantastic band with a ton of great songs.  I think “Flagpole Sitta” is still probably my favorite of their’s, but it’s one of many excellent choices.  Meanwhile, “Lovefool” is good, but is nowhere close to the best Cardigans song.  They have like 7 albums, all of which are great.  I’ve talked before about my love for Nina Persson.

In the US, I don’t think people know much about Blur apart from “Song 2” but they’re justifiably huge in other parts of the world.

Others?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Most underrated bands

Who are the most underrated bands?  By underrated I don’t mean ‘unknown’ – bands that people simply haven’t heard of.  I mean bands that are well known by a lot of people, and unfairly maligned.  Often, the sort of bands I’m thinking about are unfairly called ‘one hit wonders’ who actually had tons of good music. And often that one hit is among the poppiest of their songs and became a hit because it tapped into the zeitgeist of a specific moment, which now makes it sound both dated and plebian. But I’m also curious to hear if people want to make a case for the greatness of, say, U2 or The Eagles or Barry Manilow or something.

I guess I should also say: I’m most interested in cases where the disdain is directed at the band itself, not just the genre it represents.  Lots of people hate Justin Bieber or Iron Maiden or whatever, and I’m sure their fans would say that’s unfair.  But really it’s just that people don’t like that style of music. So I want to control for that effect.

Here are some of my suggestions:

The Mighty Mighty Bosstones. Now, I like The Impression That I Get a lot, but it’s hardly a good representation of what the band is all about.  They started out as a hardcore band with some horns – certainly not a ‘ska’ band in any normal sense.  And their first four albums are really really good.  Check out Toxic Toast or Almost Anything Goes if you don’t believe me.  Or their cover of Tin Soldiers (which blows the very good original by Stiff Little Fingers completely out of the water).

The Goo Goo Dolls. Set aside the silly name, and pretend that their two mega-hits (Iris and Name) never existed, and what you’ve got is a band who made five or six very good records in the late 80s and 90s in the tradition of The Replacements.  Seriously, Superstar Car Wash is chock-full of tracks that people would love if they had come from Westerberg.  Now, obviously they didn’t have quite the songwriting chops or sonic range of The Replacements, but what they did they did pretty darn well for quite a while. Check out Girl Right Next To Me, On the Lie, Slide, Ain’t That Unusual, or Just the Way You Are.

The Monkees.  A fake band invented to capitalize on the post-Beatles craze, constructed in order to act in a TV show.  A lot of the early hits had only one or two of the ‘band’ involved in any way in the recording process.  But over time they exerted more influence and made themselves into an actual band.  And even when it was just the backing music for a TV show, written by hired guns and recorded by studio musicians, the music was pretty darn good.

Oasis. Maybe I’m overstating the degree of the backlash against all their absurdities. So it’s possibly they’re not really ‘underrated.’  But my sense is that most people think of them primarily in terms of the feuds, the megalomania, and the overwrought sense of their own importance.  And then there’s the meta-backlash against the series of polls where people called Definitely Maybe the greatest album of all time, and so forth.  But if you focus too much on that stuff, you’ll lose track of the fact that those first two albums really were fantastic.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Top five songs with the word ‘love’ in the title

1. Love Will Tear Us Apart – Joy Division
2. Elevator Love Letter – Stars
3. Tunnel of Love – Dire Straits
4. Will You Love Me Tomorrow – The Shirelles
5. All You Need is Love – The Beatles

I think the first three are definitive. I can’t see being persuaded to exclude any of them from the list. I’m willing to listen to arguments for some other songs in the 4th and 5th slots. The Magnetic Fields have some strong contenders from 69 Love Songs. “The One I Love” is among the definitive R.E.M. songs. There are about five songs from The Supremes that deserve serious consideration. And “We Found Love” is my favorite pop song in a very long time – can make a strong case for including it. And then you have your value picks: “Let’s Call It Love” by Sleater-Kinney or “Love Me I’m a Liberal” by Phil Ochs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Even if it is the best I gave

Without Pain – Rogue Wave

My favorite type of music is basically ‘sad boys with guitars singing about their feelings.’ Coincidentally, that’s precisely the sort of music that Rogue Wave make.  And yet, I’ve never quite fallen for them.  I’ve liked each one of their albums, but haven’t quite loved any of them.

That’s the case once again, with last year’s Nightingale Floors.  There’s not quite enough here to really knock me on my heels.  But they’re getting closer and closer.  It’s full of beautiful songs, clever wordplay, and nicely compact little melodies. I can’t quite recommend it unequivocally, but if you’ve liked any of their other work, you’ll probably like this one a lot, too.

Without Pain has a jaunty tilt to it.  College is indie pop of the highest quality.  The Closer I Get has that wintry feel of the first Fleet Foxes album.  Siren’s Song only really has one good hook spaced out over five minutes but it’s such a glorious hook that it’s more than enough.

I’m still waiting for the Rogue Wave album that combines all the bits I like and packs it all together a bit more tightly.  When and if it comes, it will be a truly fantastic record.  For now, I’m happy to listen to a bunch of very nice songs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Its liquidity, its ceaseless overlapping

Condensedindents – She, Sir

Back in the halcyon days of the blog, I fell all over myself with love for a song by She, Sir.  It’s now been the better part of a decade since I wrote that post, but they have finally come out with a full-length album.  And I’m happy to tell you that it was well worth all that wait.

Go Guitars draws in equal parts from the traditions of shoegaze and indie pop, and is jam-packed with songs that hit that perfect sweet spot previously found in your JAMCs, your Trembling Blue Stars, your Real Estates, your Felts, your Echoes and maybe even some Bunnymen.

These are shimmery pop songs filled with reverb, immediately present and yet still elusive, mysterious.  They evoke a sense of distance – with sonic wells that suggest echoes returning from miles deep – while still surrounding you with sheets of gauzy silk.  You hear impressions, possibilities, intense emotions – but always through a filter.  You are catching glimpses into alternate possibilities.  Beautiful, impossible worlds filled with singing clouds and geometries that fold back on themselves.

“Doubtless the notes which we hear at such moments tend, according to their pitch and volume, to spread out before our eyes over surfaces of varying dimensions, to trade arabesques, to give us the sensation of breadth or tenuity, stability or caprice. But the notes themselves have vanished before these sensations have developed sufficiently to escape submersion under those which the succeeding or even simultaneous notes have already begun to awaken in us. And this impression would continue to envelop in its liquidity, its ceaseless overlapping, the motifs which from time to time emerge, barely discernible, to plunge again and disappear and drown, recognized only by the particular kind of pleasure which they instil, impossible to describe, to recollect, to name, ineffable — did not our memory, like a labourer who toils at the laying down of firm foundations beneath the tumult of the waves, by fashioning for us facsimiles of those fugitive phrases, enable us to compare and to contrast them with those that follow.”

–Marcel Proust, Swann’s Way

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What if we’re just passing through time

No One Knows Nothing Anymore – Billy Bragg

Billy Bragg doesn’t change much over the years.  You know basically what you’ll get: some populism, some perfectly drawn emotional portraits, and a nice little bit of humor.  I rarely love his records, but I pretty much always like them.  And Tooth & Nail is no exception.

It’s among the least aggressively political of his records.  Most of these songs dwell in the more rough and tumble world of emotional vulnerability and weary work.  That makes the whole project feel more like a halfway point than a completed project, but that’s actually quite a nice place for it to be.  It’s a record for asking questions and wondering what it’s all about – and that seems pretty appropriate for the current state of the world.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

I’m getting too old to be calling names

Hit Me – Mystikal

It’s always a bit weird taking in the art of morally-dubious folks. Obviously, that idea is very much in the news these days with the latest rounds of general horribleness re: Woody Allen. And I’ve plenty of conversations over the years about whether it’s acceptable to enjoy Roman Polanski movies, or whether it should matter to us that James Brown assaulted his wife with a lead pipe. And the relationship between violence and rap music is obviously well covered.

I’m not quite so committed to the idea of transferable culpability that I think art can be categorically dismissed due to the sins of its creator. But on the other hand, there’s something deeply creepy and unsettling about enjoying the good work of bad people. but on the other other hand, I also very strongly oppose the idea that people should be defined by their worst deeds.

All of which brings me to this song from Mystikal, who is one of New Orleans rap’s elder statesmen these days. He served six years in jail for sexual battery (effectively, rape) from 2004-2010. And since then has been back in and out of jail for various issues of battery, violating parole, etc. Given all that, I had pretty much completely forgotten about him. But then I heard this song and was reminded of just how great his mix of funk, rap, and New Orleans horns can really be. It’s fitting in so many ways that this song is sort of a tribute to James Brown.

He hasn’t released an album since 2001, but supposedly a new one is on its way. I have to admit that I’m excited to hear it.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Reaching up, reaching how far no one knows

Skyscraper Souls feat. Freedom Fry – Chordashian

Ignore the terrible band name, and take a big bite of glorious electro-pop. It walks the line nicely between dance groove and introspective motility, making it well suited for either strutting on the dancefloor or for a languid afternoon on a tropical beach.

Chordashian are a duo from Brooklyn (of course they are), putting out a ton of great music like this. In fact, they just put out another great new track this week. Check it out:

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

You’re better off dead

No One’s Gonna Know – Tristen

She apparently got some stick from the Nashville types for going pop with this record, but for my money she sounds much better dipping into the synthy waters than she did as a more straightforward country singer.

This is one of those songs that’s essentially built around one single glorious line – but it’s deployed to such great effectiveness that it never gets old.  It’s all dips, and twists, and bursts of syncopated charm.

The album is called Caves, and is well worth your time.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment