Drunks and children they always tell the truth

Drugs And Kittens I’ll Drink To That – Mighty Mighty Bosstones

Today is National Drug Take-Back Day.  The idea is that you can dispose of your expired or unused prescription drugs in a safe manner.

Let’s compare that idea to gun buybacks.  Famously, because of the ‘gun show’ loophole, the private sale of guns is basically unrestricted.  This was made extremely evident at a gun buyback a couple months ago, when a guy simply stood outside and offered to out-bid the government.

If the same fellow wanted to do this today at a drug take-back event, he wouldn’t be allowed to do it.  Why? Because selling prescription drugs for non-medical use is illegal.  After all, someone might get HURT.

Crazy world, huh?

On a related note: here’s a nice thinkpiece from John Cassidy at The New Yorker: What If the Tsarnaevs Had Been the ‘Boston Shooters’?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Cover my skin with your sunkissed light

Texas – Magic Man

I don’t miss the 80’s.  It was a terrible decade mostly full of terrible people.  And on the whole, the music wasn’t great either.  But every rule has exceptions, and in this case it’s synth pop.  Sure, like all genres it has some trainwrecks.  But when done right, there isn’t much that sounds better.

Magic Man seem to agree.  They are the logical heirs to that tradition, blowing some of the more famous bands of recent years (The Killers, The Bravery, etc.) clean out of the water. Just listen to that synth line, those thumping drums, the ode to sunshine and nights spent on a rooftop and a whole lot of sex.  This is one of those songs that sounds so simple that you’d think anyone could do it, but which would turn saccharine and chintzy in the hands of all but the most deft musicians.

Thankfully, Magic Man do it right.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I wanna be your best friend

Best of Friends – Palma Violets

It’s got that messy garage rock feel, but I can also hear a lot of Springsteen in the guitars and the shouted chorus.  And it sure sounds like they consumed a fair amount of Strummer and Jones while writing this one.

All of which is to say: there’s nothing particularly new here.  But who cares?  It sounds great, and the world will never have enough shouted punk anthems.  As long as there continue to be young guys armed with guitars, songs like this are worth listening to.

If you want a contemporary reference, Palma Violets are basically the Arctic Monkeys for 2012.  They burst onto the scene in the UK, and the question now is whether they catch any ears over on this side of the pond.  Based on this song, you have to like their chances.

The album is called 180, and it came out last month.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

When 90% isn’t really 90%

So we all know that 90% of people support background checks.  A fact which has caused Maureen Dowd to become a parody of herself (seriously, that column has to represent the exact moment when we hit Peak Dowd, right?).  But some new polling helps to splash a bit of cold water on that number – and clarifies some of the confusing elements at work in our contemporary political environment.

According to a Pew poll:

The key Senate vote that halted gun control legislation last week is drawing a mixed reaction from the American public: 47% express negative feelings about the vote while 39% have a positive reaction to the Senate’s rejection of gun control legislation that included background checks on gun purchases. Overall, 15% say they are angry this legislation was voted down and 32% say they are disappointed. On the other side, 20% say are very happy the legislation was blocked, while 19% say they are relieved.

That doesn’t sound like 90% support.  So what’s up?

Well, a couple things. First, there are ‘background checks’ and then there are background checks. People might support the general concept that there should be some sort of check without supporting the specific things that were up for debate here. That said, I think you would find many people who fell into the ‘relieved’ and ‘very happy’ category who couldn’t really explain what precisely was wrong with this bill. Which leads to the second – and far more important – point.

The way people feel about policies is VERY STRONGLY connected to larger themes of partisan/communal identification. For many people, strong NRA rejection of a proposal indicates that it’s the ‘wrong sort’ of background check, and strong Republican opposition signifies the same thing. Conversely, a strong push from Obama might well dissuade a lot of these people from supporting the idea. If you think that Obama is a socialist Fifth Column for global UN domination, then you’re just never going to trust him to implement this stuff in a good manner.

The larger point here is that MANY policies fall into this confusing area, where theoretical support evaporates as soon as actual ideas are on the table. Lots of people want to cut spending, but they aren’t very happy about the actual proposed spending cuts. Lots of people in 2009 were pretty sure that health care was broken, but hated every single idea for improving things. Even up in the Supreme Court, you can find Anthony Kennedy: who thinks that states are not allowed to impose ‘undue burdens’ on women seeking abortion, but never seems to think that any actual policy constitutes such a burden.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Nobody actually wants to be forgiven they just hate to be wrong

Sunglasses – Saturday Looks Good to Me

Am I crazy for thinking this song basically sounds like someone laid an indie-pop vocal track on top of an old ska song and then threw a bunch of old girl group harmonies into the mix?  One thing I can say for sure: it’s pretty damn catchy.

This is off their upcoming album One Kiss Ends It All, which promises to be a festival of jangle pop the likes of which we haven’t seen since…well, since Allo Darlin’ last year.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Do you feel the love? I feel the love

San Francisco (Little Daylight Remix) – The Mowgli’s

This is such an exuberant song. I’ve probably listened to it 30 times or more in the last week. I just can’t get over how good it feels to hear “Do you feel the love? I feel the love” over the sound of fireworks and sunshine. This is one of those songs that sounds like chorus layered on top of chorus on top of chorus. It’s big and bright and joyous and too much fun to even describe.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Was the 2012 result inevitable?

Last weekend I was at the Midwest Political Science Association conference in Chicago. While there I attended a neat roundtable on the 2012 election, featuring blog-stars Nate Silver and Ezra Klein, as well as some political science folks with pretty prominent online presences (Larry Bartels, John Sides, Drew Linzer, Simon Jackman, Lynn Vavreck).

One interesting question was posed: was the result of the presidential election inevitable? Now, you can think about this a few different ways. Obviously, there’s always a possibility of radical changes. I mean, if there had been a terrorist attack that was clearly Obama’s fault and did significant damage, you’d have to think Romney wins. That is, of course, what the Right wanted Benghazi to be.

But assuming all external conditions remain the same, was there a pathway to Republican victory?

One panelist (Jackman, I think) suggested that Romney could have got it done if he had a better message. Basically: “Obama’s a nice guy but he’s out of his depth. Bring me in and I’ll get things done.” Another panelist responded (I think quite rightly): we should be deeply skeptical of any argument that says the election would have gone differently if a politician had said something different.

I think that’s true for a couple of reasons. First, you’ll almost always find that whatever language they’re ‘supposed’ to use is already IN USE. If it doesn’t become the meta-narrative of the campaign it’s usually because it simply doesn’t have the stickiness that the pundit thinks it does.

Second, while I’m intrinsically skeptical of this argument, it nevertheless seems like we should assume that the pros know what they’re doing. If they are not using a certain argument front and center, it’s most likely because they have good poll-data or good reasons to think it won’t sell well. Of course, simple deference on stuff like this would be crazy. Political science certainly can play the role of sabermetrics to the traditionalism of political institutions. But the political campaigns have SO MUCH more data to work with than political scientists. These are not fly-by-night operations, Mark Penn notwithstanding. All of which is to say: our impulse should be to assume that the campaigns are doing a pretty good job.

Third, while it’s very easy to see how certain kinds of appeals could garner new votes, it’s often harder to see how the sort of campaign that would be necessary to get those votes will erode their base of support. But, of course, if you gain one new vote and lose an existing one then you haven’t actually gained anything.

And that’s the real rub of it. Romney in retrospect looks like a somewhat weak candidate to some people, for a variety of reasons. But almost all of those reasons stem from the basic obligations imposed by his potential voter pool. He lost a lot of Hispanic voters due to his support for ‘self deportation’ but it’s not like he could have simply adopted a pro-immigration stance. The party wouldn’t have allowed it. Lots of people lamented that the Romney of the first debate wasn’t the Romney of the whole campaign. But if that guy was front and center, his support from the right would likely have plummeted. And so on.

None of which is to say that it’s impossible to imagine a Republican winning the election, but it really is difficult to figure out where the extra 4% of votes could have come from, without eroding the 47% he did get. Which also helps to explain why Romney was pretty much the ‘inevitable’ nominee – at least after Perry imploded, Pawlenty backed out, and the other viable names (Jeb Bush, Christie, Mitch Daniels, etc.) didn’t pursue campaigns. It’s not that Romney was a perfect candidate; it’s just that no one else was going to be able to construct a coalition of voters that could hold together for any length of time.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

I’m looking for one thing real tonight

One Thing Real – Dan Bern

Matt Yglesias is unhappy that a Diet Coke ad is not properly representing the division of labor in the production of pop music. Yes really.

Apparently the ad depicts Taylor Swift writing the lyrics to a song, when in fact someone else wrote it; she merely performs it. Except, in fact, she is credited as a co-writer on the song. But nevertheless, he wants to insist, he’s got a larger point here. Which is: “there’s a kind of odd convention arising out of rock music that the ideal is to be making a recording of yourself playing a song you wrote yourself.”

Look, people do sometimes place too much priority on authenticity. There is plenty of room in our musical culture for people who ‘merely’ perform or for people who ‘merely’ produce. Or for people who write songs but don’t perform. Some of the finest music in rock and roll comes from studio musicians playing for a buck. Some of the best songs of the 60s were made by Phil Spector from behind the controls, or written by Goffin/King but sung by other people. Modern pop music is often generated via two distinct groups of people (pop stars and producers) linking together in various ways.

And that’s all fine. There’s lots of good music in there.

But it’s not a coincidence that a LOT of the very best music of the modern era comes from people who take charge of the entire chain of custody in their music.

The imaginative element of music, which is what really matters to us, has very little to do with pure virtuosity.  Anyone can record a cover, and sometimes the cover will be (technically) far better produced than the original. But on the whole, the ‘best’ version of a song is usually the one recorded by the original artist, and that’s because there’s an organic component to the whole process.

Even more, if you are going to follow an artist for a long time, it’s because their entire artistic output gels together. It’s about their ability to consistently produce high-quality work that comes from a particular place, that speaks to a certain personality.  If Okkervil River releases a new album, I know that Will Sheff wrote some brilliant lyrics, and I know that I’ll be hearing him sing.  And that’s what I want.  It’s not a ‘problem’ that Sheff doesn’t have the most technically pure voice.  I don’t WANT a perfect rendition.  I want the beautiful cracks of “Westfall” or the soaring and jagged peaks of “The War Criminal…”  Isaac Brock has a lisp.  Dylan is Dylan.  Michael Stipe has a range of about seven notes, but R.E.M. writes songs for that voice.  And so on.

All of which is to say: while great music certainly CAN be made via the division of labor, it still makes plenty of sense to valorize the artist or band who can start from nothing and turn it into a complete song.  It’s not the only way to make music, but it’s certainly one very important way.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Shrouded in the red white and blue with the stripes

Houses on the Hill – Whiskeytown

It’s a terribly sad song, about the things that are just taken away from us.  More than that, about the things we can never even find the words to talk about after their gone.

A woman in love, who feels the pain of separation, and the deep feeling of pride that he goes away to serve their country.  And then…nothing.  What is it like to just sit there every day hoping for a letter – knowing that you can’t dare wish for anything more.

And then…he’s gone and there’s nothing left but those letters.  But you can’t mourn forever, so eventually you meet someone new, settle down, have a family, and live out your life.  But all that time, there’s a box in the attic that holds your secret memories.  Your dreams of a completely different life.  Of a different family.  Of a road untraveled.  How could you ever find the words to tell your children that you never really meant to have them, that they are the result of some bullet fired before they were born?

You can’t.  It wouldn’t be fair.  And yet…you can’t just throw away those letters.  So they sit there, unread for decades.  An unread story, an unlit candle, a work of art never finished.  They’re pregnant with meaning, but we will never be able to know what it is.  We can only guess…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Top 10 Paul Simon songs

I’m calling this a list of my favorite Paul Simon songs, but these are almost exclusively Simon and Garfunkel songs. To be honest, I’ve never been a particularly big fan of Simon’s solo work. He’s got plenty of nice songs spread throughout the years, but very little that rises to the level of his songs from the sixties. Still, I had to expand things to his whole discography simply for the sake of Graceland.

10. The Sun is Burning (Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.)
I have a somewhat weird fascination with songs about apocalypse. In high school I collected them pretty relentlessly, and this was in a pre-MP3 world, too, so it was pretty hard to compile them. For obvious reasons, a lot of these songs come from folk and from metal. In each case it makes sense, but it’s kind of a weird pairing.

Anyways, of the entire set, this one is probably my favorite song. It’s just so achingly beautiful. Until the final two verses, there’s no hint whatsoever that it’s even going anywhere dark.

9. Diamonds on the Soles of Her Shoes (Graceland)
I’ve always had a big crush on the woman in this song. There’s something effortless in the dualism of it. You could think of her as careless (a Gatsby character), so rich that she has diamonds even on the soles of her shoes. But you can also think of her as rich in spirit, not ashamed of who she is and where she’s from, but feeling no need to flaunt it. She wears the diamonds because…why not. But she wears them on her soles, where no one will ever see them, where they are trodden on every day. “She’s a rich girl, she don’t try to hide it, diamonds on the soles of her shoes.” But later, “She said you’ve taken me for granted because I please you, wearing these diamonds.” And you wonder…was she cast out or did she leave? And is it possible that she’s far happier than she could ever have been in high society now that she’s out on the streets with the poor boy? There’s no way to no for sure, but that’s what makes it such a great song.

Because here’s the thing, the best he can do is put on a new set of clothes and some aftershave. He can’t take her out on the town, maybe doesn’t even have a home. It’s sad and discouraging, but also beautiful. Because suddenly “by the bodegas and the lights on Upper Broadway,” it’s no longer diamonds on the soles of HER shoes. It’s diamonds on the soles of THEIR shoes.

And then he just says ‘oooooooooo’ as if everyone knows what he’s talking about…because what else can you say?

8. The Only Living Boy in New York (Bridge Over Troubled Water)
Some of the best ‘ahhhhs’ ever recorded. The song is Paul saying goodbye to Art (they originally went by the name Tom and Jerry), and it’s pretty much the sweetest song about a band breaking up you’re ever likely to hear. No hard feelings, just an expression of joy about what they were able to do together, even if it was for only a short time. And yet, it’s by no means a happy song. You can’t regret what needs to be, but you can still feel the pain of its loss.

7. Flowers Never Bend With The Rainfall (Parsley, Sage, Rosemary, and Thyme)
It’s such a beautiful and simple melody, and the harmonies are gorgeous. The line that really gets me is: “I am blinded by the light / Of God and truth and right / And I wander in the night without direction.”

6. The Sounds Of Silence (Sounds of Silence)
I love the original, quiet, acoustic version of this song. But there’s no denying the power of the electric one. The juxtaposition of the electric jangle just makes the refrain against the sound of silence reverberate that much more powerfully.

You might not know this, but the drums, bass, and electric guitar overdub were recorded by Bob Dylan’s studio band in the immediate aftermath of them recording “Like a Rolling Stone.”

That kind of blows my mind, really. To record one of the finest records in history, and then on a producer’s whim add the crucial bits to a relatively unknown track by some duo with a goofy name (who had broken up at this point), which then springs that song to #1…

It’s crazy to think that Paul Simon might never have become famous if not for Tom Wilson asking for those overdubs – completely without the knowledge of Simon or Garfunkel.

5. The Boy in the Bubble (Graceland)
I was too young to experience Graceland firsthand, but I can easily imagine what it would have been like to hear it fresh. For all the nice songs in Simon’s catalog from between Bridge Over Troubled Water and Graceland, it was certainly a comparatively weak period. You could easily be forgiven for thinking that there were no more great songs left in him.

And then he went to South Africa, causing controversy for his violation of the sanctions. What he came back with was a record that mixed the classic Paul Simon songwriting skill with world music, and wrapped it all up in a beat that feels very much a product of the mid-80s (with all the good and bad implications that come with that thought). It’s really pretty crazy that it works.

But it doesn’t just work, it’s mind-blowing. It’s a revelation.

This doesn’t sound like Simon tacking on some ‘world’ sounds in order to spice things up. It sounds like him getting caught up in the tempest of sounds and feelings and doing his best to find himself within it. It’s distinctly a Paul Simon album, but there is simply no way that anything remotely like this song could have been produced out of a different milieu. It’s what makes his voice sound so perfect on the line “these are the days of miracle and wonder” – because you can tell how genuinely he feels it.

4. Kathy’s Song (Sounds of Silence)
One of the very finest love songs ever written. Also one of his finest pieces of poetry. It’s a product of a very specific moment in Simon’s life, and yet it’s also completely universal. It’s simply the feeling of quiet desperation, the lack of certainty that you will ever amount to anything or that it will ever make sense. And it’s the way that love helps sustain in those moments. It’s not that we’re rescued by love; it’s just that the struggle and the pain is somehow redeemed, made worthwhile.

3. The Boxer (Bridge Over Troubled Water)
This song was Paul Simon’s version of Born to Run. It famously took over 100 hours for them to produce a recording that satisfied him, and he drove everyone crazy trying to micro-manage it. He was also tremendously unhappy with the wordless chorus, which was only meant to be a placeholder until he figured out the right words. But for me, that’s part of the serendipity of the song. There’s something ineffable about those repetitions of ‘lie la lie’ that couldn’t possibly have been captured with lyrics.

This will, forever I think, be the benchmark against which coming-of-age songs are measured. The story is so sad and desolate and sparse; it combines beautifully with the huge cannon-fire drums, the strings, the rising tide. Simon’s finger-picked guitar is wonderful here, too.

You know, the 60s almost defy belief. So much took place in so short a time. And when we think about ‘the 60s,’ really we’re thinking about a period even shorter than a full decade. You might say that the 60s started in Dallas, 1963 and ended in Woodstock, 1969. But for me, I can’t help but think that the 60s really ended with just two little musical moments. First, The End from The Beatles. And second, the final verse of this song. The boxer stands alone and cries out “I am leaving, I am leaving” – but the fighter still remains. And curtains draw close on the decade.

2. Graceland (Graceland)
In one sense, it’s a fairly straightforward song about broken hearts and the difficult task of rebuilding a life. In another, it’s about the existential meaning of love, and what it means to live your life FOR something as opposed to simply existing. And mixed in with all of that is the thoughts of fading empires and the politics of identity. All in all, it’s really nothing more or less than the sound of hope which shines through in the darkest of times – not always (or even often) successfully. But trying nonetheless.

It opens: “The Mississippi Delta was shining like a national guitar / I am following the river down the highway through the cradle of the civil war.” That is pure poetry, evocative and beautiful. And it establishes the multi-layered themes. Traveling with the one who loves your most truly (your son) on a pilgrimage to the roots of rock and roll, seeing the country that tore itself apart and slowly (very slowly) began to heal itself over the centuries, and thinking about your own world being blown apart.

So it’s no surprise when you hear the next verse:

She comes back to tell me she’s gone
As if I didn’t know that
As if I didn’t know my own bed
As if I’d never noticed the way she brushed her hair from her forehead
And she said losing love is like a window in your heart
Everybody sees you’re blown apart
Everybody sees the wind blow

The deep, intense sadness. The slight sense of bemusement and disbelief. The realization that you knew all along but just couldn’t quite admit it. And the falling down of walls that you have tried desperately to erect between your interior and the world outside.

There aren’t answers here, but there really couldn’t be. The important thing is the searching, not what you will find.

1. A Poem on the Underground Wall (Parsley, Sage, Rosemary, and Thyme)
It’s the other side of The Sounds of Silence, the poetry of the underground. When there is nothing except the suffocating silence, a simple scrawl of four letters is all that’s left. It challenges us to mark the violence, to remain attuned to the impossibility of representation, to wrestle ourselves out of a stupor.

And what is the word? For years I just assumed it to be an obscenity. An expression of rage to mark the hypocrisy. The truly obscene, it says, is the advertisement that has been written over. No matter its connotations, a word is still an act of poetry. But advertisements are all the more disgusting because they hide themselves under the clean veneer of happy consumption.

But after years of listening to the song, it suddenly dawned on me that there’s another equally plausible word, something that stands in direct opposition: “love.” I think there’s a deliberate ambiguity here. And it’s not just an ambiguity of the wording, but also of the possibility for meaning at all.

The crayon is a rosary; it’s an object to signify devotion. We hold onto it in order to grab hold of something stable in the midst of chaos. Held with true belief, it transforms the bearer. It gives us a sense of deeper purpose. But that purpose is not found in the object but comes through its use. Individual words, individual prayers, these have no meaning by themselves. They obtain meaning through their context.

The word scrawled across the advertisement is only poetry because it is there, in that place, at that time. What it means depends on who we are every bit as much as it depends on what it says.

In my heart of hearts, I can see the bold letters screaming ‘fuck.’ And yet, in that desperate plea, I can hear a whisper, a quiet voice reminding us that the WORD doesn’t matter. Salvation is not in the word; it’s in the act. Even more, it’s in the faith that lies behind the act. The faith that one word, scratched onto a subway wall, can still be heard. And that is, above all, faith in the power of ‘love.’

Honorable mentions
11. America (Bookends)
12. I Am a Rock (Sounds of Silence)
13. The Dangling Conversation (Parsley, Sage, Rosemary, and Thyme)
14. Homeward Bound (Parsley, Sage, Rosemary, and Thyme)
15. Mrs. Robinson (Bookends)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 3 Comments